Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’ve been charging my AirPods with my Apple Watch charger for a while now so 🤷‍♂️
 
Of course there won't be any new features.
Apple likes to bleed its customers dry, first to buy the new version with solely a different charging port - and then introduce a new product to catch them again.
You do realize the cable is included in the box and that people with any common sense won’t upgrade just for the port?
 
thanks EU for this environmental disaster. could have kept using billions of perfectly functioning lightning cables but nope.

it's clear EU has no idea what they're doing. look at the annoying cookie popups for further proof. anyone who thinks otherwise are in absolute denial.
You have no idea what you talking about, best thing which could Happen for environment and users.
 
Now, will they release a standalone case for people who don’t want to replace their AirPods altogether? Or does Apple hate the environment??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ignatius345
Glad I bought my APP2 last week with the lightning port, 1 less cable to lug around
 
Well, I agree with you regarding FaceID, but many people think that FaceID is a step backward. And for them, they can either decide to buy a high end iPhone and live with FaceID, or stick with an iPhone SE.

Ok but Apple made the switch because they believe it offered many upgrades.

Switching from lightning to usb-c on AirPods case didn't offer an upgrade. It's doing the exact same responsibilities as before at the cost of throwing away functional cables.

Your second part would only make sense if this was done purely by Apple's decision. But the EU's mandate on iPhones forced Apple to switch. We're entitled to what Apple chooses to do with their designs decisions, not by EU's design decisions.
 
Now, will they release a standalone case for people who don’t want to replace their AirPods altogether? Or does Apple hate the environment??
It’s people who discard their case with lightning for USB-C that hate the environment. Businesses do what businesses do. Make more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Shame they didn't move AirPods Pro 2nd gen to USB-C last year, considering the USB-C Apple TV remote was unveiled at the exact same event
Reminds me of when they changed the iPhone 12 cable from USB-A to USB-C in 2020, while keeping the USB-A cable with the Apple Watch Series 6. Sometimes those teams don’t seem to talk to each other.
 
USB-C switch on AirPods is an environmental disaster for nearly zero benefits.
Many people use wireless charging. For them, they might not need at all to buy a new cable. For people who want wired charging, they can take any USB-C cable (from their PlayStation controller, their iPad, their Mac, etc.). I'm sure that in 2023, many tech enthusiasts already have at least one USB-C cable. So I don't think it's nearly as close to an environmental disaster as you pretend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crazynewf7
Many people use wireless charging. For them, they might not need at all to buy a new cable. For people who want wired charging, they can take any USB-C cable (from their PlayStation controller, their iPad, their Mac, etc.). I'm sure that in 2023, many tech enthusiasts already have at least one USB-C cable. So I don't think it's nearly as close to an environmental disaster as you pretend.

Pretty sure Apple has data on how people charge their AirPods. If the majority did charge via wireless, they would have eliminated the port.

In 2023, many enthusiasts have a surplus of Lightning cables that's going to ewaste. It is quite an environmental disaster.
 
Everything usb c now finally the iPhone gets in and the AirPods as well that’s just awesome, no more stupid s** cables, slow as f*** and little water and they don’t work for hours finally over for this stupid lightning cables.and also so many times you had to have like 2-3 different cables just to charge your apple devices, can’t understand who things that’s a bad thing probably only people which have one iPhone and that’s it.
 
Pretty sure Apple has data on how people charge their AirPods. If the majority did charge via wireless, they would have eliminated the port.

In 2023, many enthusiasts have a surplus of Lightning cables.
I'm not so sure. People might need the port when on the go (e.g. you're in a plane and you want to give a boost to your AirPods. Apple also needs the port for diagnostic purposes, to see if there is anything wrong with the earbuds hardware
 
There's a lithium battery in every airpod case. If they cared about the environment they should let people trade in the case for a usb-c one and keep the airpods while also promising to recycle the cases responsibly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syk
Pretty sure Apple has data on how people charge their AirPods. If the majority did charge via wireless, they would have eliminated the port.

In 2023, many enthusiasts have a surplus of Lightning cables that's going to ewaste. It is quite an environmental disaster.


My heart goes out to all of those old yellow fraying lighting cables that will perish..

200w.gif
 
I’m already buying a new phone and two cables if the included one isn’t thunderbolt. The other cable is type A to type C for my car stereo. Eventually, I want a new type C watch puck and new AirPods but I’m waiting for the third version for that. If the new iPhones are 35 W I will update the chargers right away too. I have MagSafe but that is mounted to my computer desk so I need some others to take with me on the go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boston04and07
I’m flying long haul the weekend before the event and I really want some new AirPod pros. Looks like I’ll have to get the lightning version as I won’t have them for the trip if I wait for the usb-c ones to be released! I would prefer usb-c but I charge my AirPod 3 wirelessly all the time so I guess it doesn’t really matter
 
many enthusiasts have a surplus of Lightning cables that's going to ewaste. It is quite an environmental disaster.
Many enthusiasts had a surplus of 3.5mm headphones/earbuds. All those went to ewaste after the EU forced Apple to remove the 3.5mm headphone jack from all their iDevices.


Now iDevice users have to use AirPods with non-user replaceable batteries and shorter lifespan. What an environmental disaster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NVD
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.