Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,065
38,788


Apple is rumored to have been working on its own 5G modem for iPhones since 2018, and it appears the chip will finally debut next year.

5G-Modem-Feature-Blue.jpg

Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo today estimated that shipments of Apple's in-house 5G chip will reach 35-40 million units in 2025, and "grow rapidly" to 90-110 million units in 2026 and 160-180 million units in 2027.

Kuo previously said two iPhone models with an Apple-designed 5G modem will be released in 2025, including a fourth-generation iPhone SE in the first quarter of the year and an all-new, ultra-thin iPhone 17 model in the third quarter.

All existing iPhones that are currently sold by Apple are equipped with Qualcomm modems for cellular connectivity, but Kuo expects Apple to transition away from Qualcomm over time. Earlier this year, Apple extended its 5G modem supply agreement with Qualcomm for iPhone launches through 2026, so Apple still has plenty of time.

Apple acquired the majority of Intel's smartphone modem business in 2019, as part of its efforts to design its own 5G chip. It is unclear if Apple's chip would have any consumer benefits over Qualcomm's modems, but it would reduce Apple's reliance on Qualcomm. In 2017, Apple sued Qualcomm over alleged anticompetitive practices and $1 billion in unpaid royalty rebates. The two companies settled the lawsuit in 2019.

Article Link: Kuo: Apple's 5G Modem to Rapidly Roll Out in iPhones Starting Next Year
 
What are the benefits? If it finally produces less heat or as much heat as 4G then I'll be extremely happy.

Also does the 5G modem include 4G,3G and 2G?
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
What are the benefits? If it finally produces less heat or as much heat as 4G then I'll be extremely happy.

Also does the 5G modem include 4G,3G and 2G?
My guess is that this will only give Apple greater profit margins in the long run. The savings will not be passed to customers. Not saying it's right or wrong. It's just how business works. Apple is doing this for themselves, not for us. But I do hope there will be some efficiency improvements, less heat, better battery life. At this point I will assume no, though.
 
Last edited:
What are the benefits? If it finally produces less heat or as much heat as 4G then I'll be extremely happy.

Also does the 5G modem include 4G,3G and 2G?
Yes, it includes all of that. The benefit is that it can be integrated into the primary SoC, using less power and taking up less space...and not paying licensing fees to Qualcomm.
 
My guess is that this will only give Apple greater profit margins in the long run. The savings will not be passed onto customers. But I do hope there will be some efficiency improvements, less heat, better battery life. At this point I will assume no, though.
I think the savings will be passed on passively, by not needing to increase prices as much.
 
What are the benefits?

Apple's supply chain costs go down.

If it finally produces less heat or as much heat as 4G then I'll be extremely happy.

I'd be surprised if Apple has a secret breakthrough in this area. In the framework of the Innovator's Dilema, Apple leaped ahead of Intel on mainstream CPUs by coming up from lower end chips in mobile applications. This doesn't apply against Qualcomm who was already intensely focused on this area.

I would never rule out breakthroughs but I suspect its fundementally hard to transmit (or even receive) signals in the 10s Ghz range without using a lot (relatively speaking) of energy.
 
I would expect a slower ramp, maybe the new SE first, get real user feedback and then the standard iPhone the year after and the Pro yet another year later at a minimum…
And Qualcomm will continue to innovate…
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
My guess is that this will only give Apple greater profit margins in the long run. The savings will not be passed onto customers. But I do hope there will be some efficiency improvements, less heat, better battery life. At this point I will assume no, though.
True but apple needs to make their money back from the R&D where most companies spend millions if not billions.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.