Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Great, now people can shut the **** up about Gurman being unreliable.

I have been following rumors for a very long time and while he have been wrong on certain occasions, he is definitely not « unreliable » or « throwing things and see what sticks ».
 
Dream AI machine.

Just need a version with 2TB Memory to fit the full DeepSeek-R1 model.

Every corporation will use these for their internal AI servers. (companies hate to use external AI services due to data leakage)
You can thunderbolt 4 Studios with 512GB each
 
I guess they have their reasons in using an M3 series chip and calling it M3 (if they had called it an M4 Ultra, people would quickly have pointed that out as well)... But it does seem a little odd, "want the full power, don't use the new M4 chip, use the previous generation M3," it sort of grates, even if the M3 is demonstrably faster.

I'm guessing M4 yields aren't high enough yet or the process for an M4 Ultra isn't stable, so they have to go with the M3 architecture.
 
And now the Mac Studio is faster and yet cheaper than the Mac Pro? Does that make sense? I am not buying either, but it still feels strange to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drrich2
Ah the good old days.

image.png
 
so the M3 Ultra is an M3 level chip beuse it uses ARM v8.4, has the N3B process node?

This could be because Apple prefers to secure the manufacturing capacity of TSMC of N3E for M4 and N3P for future Mx series inlcuding maybe M4 Ultra.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mainyehc
I'm not a hardware engineer, but it feels a little bizarre/confusing with the current line up...

M4 Max in latest MBP and Studio, but the M3 Ultra is the best in the Studio? - the Mac Pro still on M2 Ultra...
Yeah is very strange. Apple seem to be all over the place with these chips!
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: blob.DK
I hear the new Mac Pro will be powered by four base Mac Minis via Thunderbolt interconnect because it has plenty of space for them. When pressed for comment, an Apple spokesperson was quoted as saying, "Because it's way easier this way, and the rest of the space will be a massive cooler for your cold beverages."
 
Last edited:
Wonder how the GPU part fares compared the competition on the desktop side of things (AMD, Intel, NVIDIA).
 
I'm not a hardware engineer, but it feels a little bizarre/confusing with the current line up...

M4 Max in latest MBP and Studio, but the M3 Ultra is the best in the Studio? - the Mac Pro still on M2 Ultra...
Shh, saying their naming convention is confusing brings out the people who say its not a problem at all and makes perfect sense.
 
Curious if this M3 Ultra chip will be supported longer than the other M3 generation chips, I mean you would think that would be the case. Also wondering how the single-core CPU performance is compared to the M4 generation. Definitely a bit confusing...
You can probably answer this by comparing the M2 Ultra with it's smaller counterpart.
 
Now I’m confused….i have an m1 ultra studio and am looking to upgrade, but not sure which way to go. M3 ultra for like $800 or go with the current gen m4 max for $2000 less and current gen performance. Anyone else in the same spot?
 
I guess they have their reasons in using an M3 series chip and calling it M3 (if they had called it an M4 Ultra, people would quickly have pointed that out as well)... But it does seem a little odd, "want the full power, don't use the new M4 chip, use the previous generation M3," it sort of grates, even if the M3 is demonstrably faster.

I'm guessing M4 yields aren't high enough yet or the process for an M4 Ultra isn't stable, so they have to go with the M3 architecture.
I'd assume the M4 isn't stable yet in an Ultra config because if they actually pulled it of, it'd be quite insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big_D
I ordered my 16" M4 Max Mac Book Pro with both the 8TB SSD and 128GB of ram. It was not suddenly made obsolete by this product announcement.

I expected the new generation of Mac Studio to have 512GB of ram and obviously USB-C 5 ports, but the 16TB SSD was a surprise and certainly was at Apple's always high wallet burning pricing. Fully loaded price of about 14,100 before taxes separates the men from the boys....

Take two, they are small 🤓
 
  • Like
Reactions: KenaiAndrews
I'm not a hardware engineer, but it feels a little bizarre/confusing with the current line up...

M4 Max in latest MBP and Studio, but the M3 Ultra is the best in the Studio? - the Mac Pro still on M2 Ultra...
Party like it's 1999
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.